Continued Studies _ 05/23/2006 (continued III)

CONTINUED STUDIES

Of

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

Observations

And

General Philosophy

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

02/16/2006 ~ 07/19/2006

05/23/2006 (continued III)

Just in that, I happen upon a thought that perhaps the "social structures" didn't necessarily fail - only that they failed to accommodate that human tendency and then convert it from the obvious, immediate results of downfall, into some form of prosperity - which as has been addressed - our attempt at Utopia seems to have done to some degree. Especially in providing the potential for "checks and balances" of those detrimental aspects so prominent in human history.

So then, in the deeper realization that we are very much in an infancy of what could prove to be a functioning Utopia, I have to wonder when the "orgy" part happens for my generation?

Surely there must be the possibility of existence beyond the topical distractions we passify ourselves with. Obviously. such is well within the capacity of this mechanism.

In recent history - the "orgy" thing looked as though it was to be instituted - but those leanings soon drudged and "seized" as it were - much because of the overt sensationalism with the dynamic itself. Very much acting to stifle itself through such obvious and somewhat "devil may care" application.

In that then, I can still hold the hope of finding myself, some semblance of that area within "Utopia." Even if I have to make it myself!... as a pleasurable and slightly humorous thought.

Envision the establishment if you will, of utilization within that capacity and dynamic of an area in which the wholesome interaction and human exchange of relationships of carious sorts, could be explored without the want or need of "one or the other" being there to impart despair? Such doesn't have to be a blur, so to speak. Nor can it truly exist within the tendency, within the area of "win" of 'lose," of malicious intent and ulterior motives.

Such exchange while accompanied with excuse, isn't "Utopian" as much as it is as result of the "win" or "lose."

Of course a person must consider the element which truly considers subjugation and domination as pleasurable - in that though, there is nothing that states such barbarism as status quo in regard to adult relationships and interaction. I suspect, that for such to be valid as "Utopian" existence, it cannot exist within "one or the other," - "win" or "lose."

yet another wonderful and quite justified, permissible thought.